On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:26:28 -0400 "Josh Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe it is intentional, no. Sean can you look at this and > see what's up? I have a couple of fixes to queue up from you already > and if you can get this one done in the next few days I'll included it > as well. So I went back in the archives. Somebody else, Thomas Gleixner I believe, was already working on the ndfc port. So, since I *had* to have a working ndfc, I put a local copy in my kernel and forgot about it. It looks like Thomas has dropped the port. I should probably resubmit the patch with the arch/ppc code removed. However, I don't think this would be for 2.6.27 timeframe since there will probably be discussion. For one, my patch just gets it working... the warp-nand.c file shows that it is not a complete solution ;) Second, there are some byte order issues. So could we just leave warp-nand.c "there but disabled" for now? Cheers, Sean _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
