Hi,
and thanks for the feedback. To make it short, the conclusions I draw from
that are:
- let the cpu type be choosen optionaly
- both target cpu and tuning cpu should be selectable
- if one cpu gets choosen, it should select some feature flag, mcpu and
mtune
option automatically in Kconfig.cputypes
- if none gets choosen, all features will be selected (is this save?)
I found these ppc64 cpu specific candidates for CONFIG_FEATURE-X:
Altivec (G4, G5, POWER6+7, PA6T)
BAT64 aka POWER3 (Power3)
FPU (all)
Std_MMU (all)
Virt_CPU_Accounting (all, except PA6T?)
VSX (power7)
There are probably some more features present, which are currently enabled by
some ifdefs for PPC64 and POWER4 (e.g. powermac/feature.c). I will not touch
them due to my little knowledge and just keep these symbols.
I guess this will become another long weekend ;-)
Marvin
On Monday 21 July 2008 09:02:47 Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the following five patches should lay a foundation to more fine-grained
> tuning on PPC64 cpus. They must be applied in order. The motivation are the
> discussions of serveral cpu specific optimizations in the past on this
> list, cleanup of the wired Makefile/CONFIG_POWERx constructs and at least
> the ownership of a PS3.
>
> The patches intoduce CONFIG_TUNE_some_cpu and CONFIG_OPT_EXCLUSIVE, with
> the aim to cover two common cases:
>
> - distributions want a common kernel, bootable on all ppc64 machines and
> tune for a certain cpu
>
> - high end users don't care about older cpus and want to compile a
> kernel
> with their favorite mcpu option
>
> I know there is also the possibility of mcpu=x and mtune=y, y>x but this
> can be tackled in the next step (hopefully).
>
> I know this will bring up some conserns, but my initial findings grepping
> the defconfigs show:
>
> - CONFIG_POWER3 enables BATS only
> it is also used the enable some configs
> it is used always in combination with CONFIG_POWER4
>
> - CONFIG_POWER4 is always combined with CONFIG_PPC64 and vice versa
> all POWER3 || POWER4 || PPC64 can be replaced by PPC64
>
> - There seems to be no support for 32-bit kernels on ppc64 machines
>
> I hope for some feedback, so this new scheme (or some other) can be
> included to mainstream kernel.
>
> Greetings
>
> Marvin
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
