Re: [PATCH] powerpc/signal32: Force inlining of __unsafe_save_user_regs() and save_tm_user_regs_unsafe()

[Nicholas Piggin]

On Mon Jun 5, 2023 at 6:58 PM AEST, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Looking at generated code for handle_signal32() shows calls to a
> function called __unsafe_save_user_regs.constprop.0 while user access
> is open.
>
> And that __unsafe_save_user_regs.constprop.0 function has two nops at
> the begining, allowing it to be traced, which is unexpected during
> user access open window.
>
> The solution could be to mark __unsafe_save_user_regs() no trace, but
> to be on the safe side the most efficient is to flag it __always_inline
> as already done for function __unsafe_restore_general_regs(). The
> function is relatively small and only called twice, so the size
> increase will remain in the noise.
>
> Do the same with save_tm_user_regs_unsafe() as it may suffer the
> same issue.

Could you put a comment so someone doesn't uninline it later? Marking
it notrace as well would be sufficient for a comment, if that works.

Thanks,
Nick

>
> Fixes: ef75e7318294 ("powerpc/signal32: Transform save_user_regs() and 
> save_tm_user_regs() in 'unsafe' version")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
> index c114c7f25645..7a718ed32b27 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
> @@ -264,8 +264,9 @@ static void prepare_save_user_regs(int ctx_has_vsx_region)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> -static int __unsafe_save_user_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext 
> __user *frame,
> -                                struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, int 
> ctx_has_vsx_region)
> +static __always_inline int
> +__unsafe_save_user_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext __user *frame,
> +                     struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, int 
> ctx_has_vsx_region)
>  {
>       unsigned long msr = regs->msr;
>  
> @@ -364,8 +365,9 @@ static void prepare_save_tm_user_regs(void)
>               current->thread.ckvrsave = mfspr(SPRN_VRSAVE);
>  }
>  
> -static int save_tm_user_regs_unsafe(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext 
> __user *frame,
> -                                 struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, unsigned 
> long msr)
> +static __always_inline int
> +save_tm_user_regs_unsafe(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext __user *frame,
> +                      struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, unsigned long msr)
>  {
>       /* Save both sets of general registers */
>       unsafe_save_general_regs(&current->thread.ckpt_regs, frame, failed);
> @@ -444,8 +446,9 @@ static int save_tm_user_regs_unsafe(struct pt_regs *regs, 
> struct mcontext __user
>  #else
>  static void prepare_save_tm_user_regs(void) { }
>  
> -static int save_tm_user_regs_unsafe(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext 
> __user *frame,
> -                                 struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, unsigned 
> long msr)
> +static __always_inline int
> +save_tm_user_regs_unsafe(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext __user *frame,
> +                      struct mcontext __user *tm_frame, unsigned long msr)
>  {
>       return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.40.1