On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 08:16:34PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > Thanks for looking so quickly, Peter: I didn't Cc you on this particular > series, but shall certainly be doing so on the ones that follow, because > a few of those patches go into interesting pmdp_get_lockless() territory.
I'm in the x86@ catch-all, which is how I saw this as quickly :-) A direct copy won't hurt ofc, the mail system will sort it out.
