On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 15:57 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > This makes sense. I think we need to order the stores in set_pte_at > regardless of CONFIG_SMP.
Nah, that shouldn't be necessary. > Also, I think we should change pte_clear to > use pte_update() so we only clear the low-order flag bits. Patch will > be sent shortly for review. Well... at one point at least we did rely on a PTE page with all PTEs cleared to be blank. It don't know if that's still the case, I need to look. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
