These changes are for patch_instruction() uses on data. Unlike ppc64 these should not be incorrect as-is, but using the patch_uint() alias better reflects what kind of data being patched and allows for benchmarking the effect of different patch_* implementations (e.g., skipping instruction flushing when patching data).
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bg...@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/static_call.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/static_call.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/static_call.c index 863a7aa24650..1502b7e439ca 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/static_call.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/static_call.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func, bool tail) mutex_lock(&text_mutex); if (func && !is_short) { - err = patch_instruction(tramp + PPC_SCT_DATA, ppc_inst(target)); + err = patch_ulong(tramp + PPC_SCT_DATA, target); if (err) goto out; } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c index 5b26a9012d2e..8a8a4688c5f4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c @@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int smp_core99_kick_cpu(int nr) mdelay(1); /* Restore our exception vector */ - patch_instruction(vector, ppc_inst(save_vector)); + patch_uint(vector, save_vector); local_irq_restore(flags); if (ppc_md.progress) ppc_md.progress("smp_core99_kick_cpu done", 0x347); -- 2.39.1