On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:46:14AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:18:13PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:19:30PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > > > > > > > Shouldn't this be: > > > > if (info.irq != NO_IRQ) > > > > > > Maybe, maybe not. See > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/211 > > > > > > I.e. maybe we should use "if (irq)". Or if we should use NO_IRQ, then we > > > need to fixup all the users of .irq. > > > > Yes, these are definitely wrong and need to be fixed. > > In rc9? ;-)
I said no such thing. :-) It agree that it is too late for .26, but I think is a reasonable goal to get fixed for 2.6.27. g. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
