Hi, On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Well yes :) But I think that's because you're thinking of > "end-users" and I'm thinking of "users" like myself - ie. _I_ use > Kconfig and I do expect myself to be able to type a 64-bit address. That doesn't really answer my question, why you need this. > > > --- .config.orig 2008-07-08 09:30:00.000000000 +1000 > > > +++ .config 2008-07-08 09:30:43.000000000 +1000 > > > @@ -370,9 +370,8 @@ > > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_RPA=m > > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_RPA_DLPAR=m > > > # CONFIG_HAS_RAPIDIO is not set > > > -CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xc000000000000000 > > > -CONFIG_KERNEL_START=0xc000000002000000 > > > -CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x02000000 > > > +CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xc0000000 > > > +CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x2000000 > > > > Why is this worse? These are constants, you're not supposed to change them > > anyway. > > The remaining values are generated in page.h and should be the same as > > before. If that isn't the case and this patch produces a nonworking > > kernel, I'd like to hear about it. > > You're right the built kernel is fine. So it's not a bug, Good, could someone please ack whether the powerpc changes are acceptable? > but I think it is nicer to have the real values in the .config. Why? bye, Roman _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
