On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 08:29:47 -0600 "Grant Likely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 07:34:23 -0600 Grant Likely wrote: > >> Specifically the case I'm thinking of is when a user of a Xilinx FPGA > >> drops a new .dts file into arch/powerpc/boot/dts (say > >> 'super-sexy-platform.dts'). However, instead of modifying the > >> Makefile or always typing 'make simpleImage.super-sexy-platform', then > >> can add 'simpleImage.super-sexy-platform' to their defconfig which I > >> can see being easier for someone to get their head around. > > > > Yeah, I thought about the Virtex case with the differing bitstreams > > after I sent out my original question. For purposes like that, this > > seems like a great fit. For truly discrete boards, I prefer discrete > > defconfigs. > > > > So overall I see value in the patch. If nobody else has objections, > > then it's fine with me. > > so.... can I have an ack? :-) Oops, sorry. Of course. Acked-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
