On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:23 -0500, Joel Schopp wrote: > >> We haven't defined a user-visible feature bit (and besides, we're really > >> getting short on these...). This is becoming a bit of concern btw (the > >> running out of bits). Maybe we should start defining an AT_HWCAP2 for > >> powerpc and get libc updated to pick it up ? > >> > > > > Joel, > > Any thoughts? > Is it a required or optional feature of the 2.06 architecture spec? If it's > required you could just use that. It doesn't solve the problem more > generically if other archs decide to implement it though.
And then we start having to expose 2.06S vs. 2.06E .. nah. I think for now, for SAO, the idea that one can "try" and if -EINVAL, try again without might work fine. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
