> > - First if the properties are present but their value match the > > register layout of a standard UART, we will bail out... not nice. > > Why would they be present in that case?
Why not ? > > - Why don't we just implement support for the reg-shift and > > offset instead ? > > Probably because the last time someone suggested that it spawned a > lengthy debate about what reg-offset/shift were supposed to do. That's lame, their definition is already quite there. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
