On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:18:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > NIP [c000000000031630] .replay_soft_interrupts+0x60/0x300 > LR [c000000000031964] .arch_local_irq_restore+0x94/0x1c0 > Call Trace: > [c000000007df3870] [c000000000031964] .arch_local_irq_restore+0x94/0x1c0 > (unreliable) > [c000000007df38f0] [c000000000f8a444] .__schedule+0x664/0xa50 > [c000000007df39d0] [c000000000f8a8b0] .schedule+0x80/0x140 > [c000000007df3a50] [c00000000092f0dc] .try_to_generate_entropy+0x118/0x174 > [c000000007df3b40] [c00000000092e2e4] .urandom_read_iter+0x74/0x140 > [c000000007df3bc0] [c0000000003b0044] .vfs_read+0x284/0x2d0 > [c000000007df3cd0] [c0000000003b0d2c] .ksys_read+0xdc/0x130 > [c000000007df3d80] [c00000000002a88c] .system_call_exception+0x19c/0x330 > [c000000007df3e10] [c00000000000c1d4] system_call_common+0xf4/0x258
Obviously the first couple lines of this concern me a bit. But I think actually this might just be a catalyst for another bug. You could view that function as basically just: while (something) schedule(); And I guess in the process of calling the scheduler a lot, which toggles interrupts a lot, something got wedged. Curious, though, I did try to reproduce this, to no avail. My .config is https://xn--4db.cc/rBvHWfDZ . What's yours? Jason