> + cur->bsr_addr = reg[i * 2]; > + cur->bsr_len = reg[i * 2 + 1];
That's fishy... hand-reading of "reg" property without taking into account the parent's #size-cells/#address-cells... can't you use of_address_to_resource or something similar and carry a struct resource around instead ? In fact, same goes with the way you do num_bsr_devs = reg_len / 16. You should rather use -another- property of well known lenght, or get the #address/#size-cells of the parent and use those appropriately. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
