On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:50:07PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 29/08/2022 à 07:52, Sathvika Vasireddy a écrit :
> > + opcode = insn >> 26;
> > +
> > + switch (opcode) {
> > + case 18: /* bl */
>
> case 18 is more than 'bl', it includes also 'b'.
> In both cases, the calculation of *immediate is the same.
It also is "ba" and "bla", sometimes written as "b[l][a]".
> It would therefore be more correct to perform the calculation and setup
> of *immediate outside the 'if ((insn & 3) == 1)', that would avoid
> unnecessary churn the day we add support for branches without link.
>
> > + if ((insn & 3) == 1) {
> > + *type = INSN_CALL;
> > + *immediate = insn & 0x3fffffc;
> > + if (*immediate & 0x2000000)
> > + *immediate -= 0x4000000;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + }
Does this handle AA=1 correctly at all? That is valid both with and
without relocations, just like AA=0. Same for AA=1 LK=0 btw.
If you only handle AA=0, the code should explicitly test for that.
Segher
