Le 09/07/2022 à 12:23, Pali Rohár a écrit : >>> >>> -ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 >>> ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN >>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=power8 >>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call >>> cc-option,-mtune=power9,-mtune=power8) >>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += -mcpu=power8 >>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += $(call >>> cc-option,-mtune=power9,-mtune=power8) >>> else >>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=power7,$(call >>> cc-option,-mtune=power5)) >>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mcpu=power5,-mcpu=power4) >>> -endif >>> -else ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64 >>> -CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=powerpc64 >>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=power7,$(call >>> cc-option,-mtune=power5)) >>> +CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += $(call >>> cc-option,-mcpu=power5,-mcpu=power4) >> >> So before that change I got -mcpu=power9 >> >> Now I get -mtune=power7 -mcpu=power5 -mcpu=power9 > > I did it like Arnd wrote. > > And seems that it does not work and now is fully out of the scope of the > original issue. Now I'm really lost here. > > So I nobody comes with better solution, I would prefer to stick with my > original version which targets _only_ e500 cores. > > Any other suggestion?
I sent a patch based on the TARGET_CPU logic, does it work for you ? Christophe
