Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> Le 16/06/2022 à 17:19, Liang He a écrit :
>> In gpio_halt_probe(), of_find_matching_node() will return a node pointer with
>> refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put() in each fail path or when 
>> it
>> is not used anymore.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Liang He <win...@126.com>
>> ---
>>   changelog:
>> 
>>   v2: use goto-label patch style advised by Christophe.
>>   v1: add of_node_put() before each exit.
>> 
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 27 +++++++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
>> index 98ae64075193..e280f963d88c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
...
>> @@ -122,8 +127,12 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   
>>      printk(KERN_INFO "gpio-halt: registered GPIO %d (%d trigger, %d"
>>             " irq).\n", gpio, trigger, irq);
>> +    ret = 0;
>>   
>> -    return 0;
>> +err_put:
>> +    of_node_put(halt_node);
>> +    halt_node = NULL;
>
> Hi,
> so now we set 'halt_node' to NULL even in the normal case.
> This is really spurious.
>
> Look at gpio_halt_cb(), but I think that this is just wrong and badly 
> breaks this driver.

I agree, thanks for reviewing.

I think the cleanest solution is to use a local variable for the node in
the body of gpio_halt_probe(), and only assign to halt_node once all the
checks have passed.

So something like:

        struct device_node *child_node;

        child_node = of_find_matching_node(node, child_match);
        ...

        printk(KERN_INFO "gpio-halt: registered GPIO %d (%d trigger, %d"
               " irq).\n", gpio, trigger, irq);
        ret = 0;
        halt_node = of_node_get(child_node);

out_put:
        of_node_put(child_node);
        
        return ret;
}


cheers

Reply via email to