Le 10/06/2022 à 17:55, Hari Bathini a écrit :
> Adding instructions for ppc32 for
>
> atomic_and
> atomic_or
> atomic_xor
> atomic_fetch_add
> atomic_fetch_and
> atomic_fetch_or
> atomic_fetch_xor
>
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbath...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Used an additional register (BPF_REG_AX)
> - to avoid clobbering src_reg.
> - to keep the lwarx reservation as intended.
> - to avoid the odd switch/goto construct.
Might be a stupid question as I don't know the internals of BPF: Are we
sure BPF_REG_AX cannot be the src reg or the dst reg ?
> * Zero'ed out the higher 32-bit explicitly when required.
>
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> index e46ed1e8c6ca..28dc6a1a8f2f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
> struct codegen_context *
> u32 dst_reg_h = dst_reg - 1;
> u32 src_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].src_reg);
> u32 src_reg_h = src_reg - 1;
> + u32 ax_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_AX);
> u32 tmp_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG);
> u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code);
> s16 off = insn[i].off;
> @@ -798,25 +799,53 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
> struct codegen_context *
> * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
> */
> case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
> - if (imm != BPF_ADD) {
> - pr_err_ratelimited("eBPF filter atomic op code
> %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
> - code, i);
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> - }
> -
> - /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */
> -
> bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg);
> + bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, ax_reg);
> +
> /* Get offset into TMP_REG */
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp_reg, off));
> + tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4;
> /* load value from memory into r0 */
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(_R0, tmp_reg, dst_reg, 0));
> - /* add value from src_reg into this */
> - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(_R0, _R0, src_reg));
> - /* store result back */
> +
> + /* Save old value in BPF_REG_AX */
> + if (imm & BPF_FETCH)
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ax_reg, _R0));
> +
> + switch (imm) {
> + case BPF_ADD:
> + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(_R0, _R0, src_reg));
> + break;
> + case BPF_AND:
> + case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH:
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(_R0, _R0, src_reg));
> + break;
> + case BPF_OR:
> + case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH:
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(_R0, _R0, src_reg));
> + break;
> + case BPF_XOR:
> + case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(_R0, _R0, src_reg));
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_err_ratelimited("eBPF filter atomic op code
> %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
> + code, i);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + /* store new value */
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(_R0, tmp_reg, dst_reg));
> /* we're done if this succeeded */
> - PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx - 3) * 4);
> + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx);
> +
> + /* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old data into src_reg
> */
> + if (imm & BPF_FETCH) {
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, ax_reg));
> + if (!fp->aux->verifier_zext)
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(src_reg_h, 0));
> + }
> break;
>
> case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) +=
> src */
