On 4/15/2022 5:29 AM, Jakob Koschel wrote:
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com> We know that "dev > dst->last_switch" in the "else" block. In other words, that "dev - dst->last_switch" is > 0. dsa_port_bridge_num_get(dp) can be 0, but the check "if (bridge_num + dst->last_switch != dev) continue", rewritten as "if (bridge_num != dev - dst->last_switch) continue", aka "if (bridge_num != something which cannot be 0) continue", makes it redundant to have the extra "if (!bridge_num) continue" logic, since a bridge_num of zero would have been skipped anyway. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkosc...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> -- Florian
