Le 13/04/2022 à 07:58, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
> There are no platforms left which subscribe ARCH_HAS_FILTER_PGPROT. Hence
> drop generic arch_filter_pgprot() and also config ARCH_HAS_FILTER_PGPROT.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux...@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com>
> ---
> mm/Kconfig | 3 ---
> mm/mmap.c | 13 ++-----------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index b1f7624276f8..3f7b6d7b69df 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -762,9 +762,6 @@ config ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
> register alias named "current_stack_pointer", this config can be
> selected.
>
> -config ARCH_HAS_FILTER_PGPROT
> - bool
> -
> config ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
> bool
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 87cb2eaf7e1a..b96e995f3733 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -107,20 +107,11 @@ pgprot_t protection_map[16] __ro_after_init = {
> };
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
> -#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FILTER_PGPROT
> -static inline pgprot_t arch_filter_pgprot(pgprot_t prot)
> -{
> - return prot;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> pgprot_t vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
> {
> - pgprot_t ret = __pgprot(pgprot_val(protection_map[vm_flags &
> - (VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC|VM_SHARED)]) |
> + return __pgprot(pgprot_val(protection_map[vm_flags &
> + (VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC|VM_SHARED)]) |
> pgprot_val(arch_vm_get_page_prot(vm_flags)));
> -
> - return arch_filter_pgprot(ret);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_get_page_prot);
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT */
