Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com> writes: > On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:31 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: >> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 12:05 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: >> > On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 00:15 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> > > We can mark arch_get_ima_policy() as __init because it's only caller >> > > ima_init_arch_policy() is __init. We can then mark >> > > is_ppc_trustedboot_enabled() __init because its only caller is >> > > arch_get_ima_policy(). >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> >> > >> > I assume you want to upstream this via power, >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com> >> >> Sorry, I just noticed that is_ppc_trustedboot_enabled() is also called >> by arch_ima_get_secureboot(). > > Never mind, arch_ima_get_secureboot() calls > is_ppc_secureboot_enabled(), not is_ppc_trustedboot_enabled().
Yeah despite the long names they are still easy to confuse :) cheers
