Le 21/03/2022 à 09:33, Finn Thain a écrit :
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>> Le 19/03/2022 à 08:20, Finn Thain a écrit :
>>> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:897:12: warning: 'pmu_battery_proc_show'
>>> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>> static int pmu_battery_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:871:12: warning: 'pmu_irqstats_proc_show'
>>> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>> static int pmu_irqstats_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:860:12: warning: 'pmu_info_proc_show' defined
>>> but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>> static int pmu_info_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> Rearrange some code and add some #ifdefs to avoid unused code warnings
>>> when CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled.
>>
>> Why not just put those three functions inside an #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS ?
>>
>
> You'd get a warning about the prototypes ("declared static but never
> defined"). Rather than add an ifdef around the prototypes as well, I just
> reordered things a little.
Then now you have callers of proc_create_single_data() inside the ifdefs
and then you have an additional #ifdef in the middle of
via_pmu_dev_init() and also have to ifdef out all proc_pmu_xxxx.
I thing ifdefing out the prototypes would be less churn.
Christophe
