Matt Sealey wrote:
I was thinking of renaming the dm hash one to rh_hash_init() and then I thought, maybe rh_heap_init() is better. Then I thought, why have rh in both places, why not rename the entire API (rheap_ and rhash_) in both cases?
I'm okay with renaming the rh_xxx calls in rheap.c to rheap_xxx. I also think renaming the rh_ calls to rhash is a good idea.
-- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
