Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 17, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
We should probably depend on !PPC_85xx until we can support such a
configuration, rather than have it break in less obvious ways.
I don't see any reason for this. While our marketing may say its not an
85xx anymore its pretty close to one. For example I plan on the board
code living in platforms/85xx.
The reason is that if we can't build both into the same kernel, the
kconfig shouldn't pretend that we can.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
