Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com> writes: > Introduce a powerpc version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will > be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so > the implementation will initially only support the PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT > attribute. > > Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig | 1 + > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ce55c2c7e534 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. > + * > + * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com> > + */ > + > +#ifndef _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H > +#define _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
Minor nit, we would usually use _ASM_POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H Otherwise looks OK to me. Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> cheers
