On 6/18/21 1:30 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 6/17/21 8:11 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com> writes:
On 6/17/21 4:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:35:17PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
In fact, the more I speak about this PMEM scenario the more I wonder:
why doesn't the PMEM driver, when switching from persistent to regular
memory and vice-versa, take care of all the necessary updates in the
numa-distance-table and kernel internals to reflect the current distances
of its current mode? Is this a technical limitation?
I sent v4 doing something similar to this .
-aneesh
