On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 09:51 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > I will. But wouldn't it make sense to allow at least for some level
> > of compatibility with older versions of U-Boot? Adding these options
> > as default would probably not hurt?
>
> Agreed. I didn't realize we could actually do this from the kernel
> build system.
>
> I'm sure others will have their two cents to add.
>
> But something like:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
> index c40fb82..52db85a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO
> BOOTCFLAGS += -g
> endif
>
> +DTS_FLAGS ?= -R4 -S 0x3000
> +
> ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn, -fstack-protector),y)
> BOOTCFLAGS += -fno-stack-protector
> endif
Hrm. Should we use -p <extra_space> instead of -S <total_space>?
Seems someone added this DTC commit last November:
commit 2b7dc8dce549ad72ad437b254bf756d7ba4c2a5a
Author: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Nov 28 10:21:12 2007 -0600
Add an option to pad the blob that is generated
There are times when we need extra space in the blob and just want
to have it added on w/o know the exact size to make it.
The padding and min size options are mutually exclusive.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thought,
jdl
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
