Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> In case performance stats for an nvdimm are not available, reading the
> 'perf_stats' sysfs file returns an -ENOENT error. A better approach is
> to make the 'perf_stats' file entirely invisible to indicate that
> performance stats for an nvdimm are unavailable.
>
> So this patch updates 'papr_nd_attribute_group' to add a 'is_visible'
> callback implemented as newly introduced 'papr_nd_attribute_visible()'
> that returns an appropriate mode in case performance stats aren't
> supported in a given nvdimm.
>
> Also the initialization of 'papr_scm_priv.stat_buffer_len' is moved
> from papr_scm_nvdimm_init() to papr_scm_probe() so that it value is
> available when 'papr_nd_attribute_visible()' is called during nvdimm
> initialization.
>
> Fixes: 2d02bf835e57('powerpc/papr_scm: Fetch nvdimm performance stats from
> PHYP')
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> index 12f1513f0fca..90f0af8fefe8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> @@ -907,6 +907,20 @@ static ssize_t flags_show(struct device *dev,
> }
> DEVICE_ATTR_RO(flags);
>
> +umode_t papr_nd_attribute_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute
> *attr,
> + int n)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, typeof(*dev), kobj);
> + struct nvdimm *nvdimm = to_nvdimm(dev);
> + struct papr_scm_priv *p = nvdimm_provider_data(nvdimm);
> +
> + /* For if perf-stats not available remove perf_stats sysfs */
> + if (attr == &dev_attr_perf_stats.attr && p->stat_buffer_len == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return attr->mode;
> +}
> +
> /* papr_scm specific dimm attributes */
> static struct attribute *papr_nd_attributes[] = {
> &dev_attr_flags.attr,
> @@ -916,6 +930,7 @@ static struct attribute *papr_nd_attributes[] = {
>
> static struct attribute_group papr_nd_attribute_group = {
> .name = "papr",
> + .is_visible = papr_nd_attribute_visible,
> .attrs = papr_nd_attributes,
> };
>
> @@ -931,7 +946,6 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
> struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc;
> unsigned long dimm_flags;
> int target_nid, online_nid;
> - ssize_t stat_size;
>
> p->bus_desc.ndctl = papr_scm_ndctl;
> p->bus_desc.module = THIS_MODULE;
> @@ -1016,16 +1030,6 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv
> *p)
> list_add_tail(&p->region_list, &papr_nd_regions);
> mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
>
> - /* Try retriving the stat buffer and see if its supported */
> - stat_size = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, NULL, 0);
> - if (stat_size > 0) {
> - p->stat_buffer_len = stat_size;
> - dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Max perf-stat size %lu-bytes\n",
> - p->stat_buffer_len);
> - } else {
> - dev_info(&p->pdev->dev, "Dimm performance stats unavailable\n");
> - }
> -
> return 0;
>
> err: nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
> @@ -1102,6 +1106,7 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> u64 blocks, block_size;
> struct papr_scm_priv *p;
> const char *uuid_str;
> + ssize_t stat_size;
> u64 uuid[2];
> int rc;
>
> @@ -1179,6 +1184,16 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> p->res.name = pdev->name;
> p->res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>
> + /* Try retriving the stat buffer and see if its supported */
> + stat_size = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, NULL, 0);
> + if (stat_size > 0) {
> + p->stat_buffer_len = stat_size;
> + dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Max perf-stat size %lu-bytes\n",
> + p->stat_buffer_len);
> + } else {
> + dev_info(&p->pdev->dev, "Dimm performance stats unavailable\n");
> + }
With this patch
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20210505191606.51666-1-vaib...@linux.ibm.com
We are adding details of whyy performance stat query hcall failed. Do we
need to print again here? Are we being more verbose here?
-aneesh
