On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:15:30 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:07:20 +1000 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Looking at Linus' git tree, it's evident that some subsystems use the > > the "[SUBSYSTEM]" notation and some use "subsystem:". If there is now > > an edict from on high that only "subsystem:" is acceptable, then I > > must have missed that memo. > > I'm all edicted out. Sometimes one just puts forth the reasoning and > lets others decide whether it's worth bothering about. I could understand > that decision being "no" :)
Well, it would be a Good Thing if all subsystem/arch maintainers would do it in the same format, whatever that format is. --- ~Randy <quote:> "It's the Government of the United States." ... The largest, and yet the least efficient, producer of computer software in the world. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
