Le 12/03/2021 à 13:50, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
This can be done in C, do it. Unrolling the loop gains approx. 15% performance. From now on, prepare_transfer_to_handler() is only for interrupts from kernel. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/kup.h | 31 ------------------- arch/powerpc/include/asm/interrupt.h | 6 +++- arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h | 8 +++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S | 16 ---------- arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.h | 3 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/head_booke.h | 3 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c | 4 +++ arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/Makefile | 1 + arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/kuep.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 9 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/kuep.c
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/kuep.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/kuep.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c70532568a28 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/kuep.c @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +#include <asm/reg.h> +#include <asm/task_size_32.h> +#include <asm/mmu.h>
Need to add <asm/kup.h> to make Robot happy (missing prototypes of kuep_lock() and kuep_unlock())
+ +#define KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(n) do { \ + if (TASK_SIZE > ((n) << 28)) \ + mtsr(val1, (n) << 28); \ + if (TASK_SIZE > (((n) + 1) << 28)) \ + mtsr(val2, ((n) + 1) << 28); \ + val1 = (val1 + 0x222) & 0xf0ffffff; \ + val2 = (val2 + 0x222) & 0xf0ffffff; \ +} while (0) + +static __always_inline void kuep_update(u32 val) +{ + int val1 = val; + int val2 = (val + 0x111) & 0xf0ffffff; + + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(0); + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(2); + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(4); + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(6); + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(8); + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(10); + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(12); + KUEP_UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(14); +} + +void kuep_lock(void) +{ + kuep_update(mfsr(0) | SR_NX); +} + +void kuep_unlock(void) +{ + kuep_update(mfsr(0) & ~SR_NX); +}