On 3/18/21 4:28 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Also we've been using it for several years and I don't think we should
risk breaking anything by changing the value now.
I guess we can leave it that way. Please read the commit log of
the second patch (not tagged as a v2 ...).
But we should remove ibm,chip-id from QEMU since the property does
not exist on PAPR and that the calculation is anyhow very broken.
I am a strong advocate of getting rid of ibm,chip-id in QEMU. That said,
we need to make sure that the current problem with CPU topologies, that
I reported in that other thread, can be fixed without it.
Thanks,
DHB
Thanks,
C.
