Thanks for the comments!

On 12/28/20 2:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 01:08:53PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
...
The overall idea looks good but I think you should consider using
a thread pool to implement it. See below.
I am not convinced, however.  Specifically, attaching this to the DRC
doesn't make sense to me.  We're adding exactly one DRC related async
hcall, and I can't really see much call for another one.  We could
have other async hcalls - indeed we already have one for HPT resizing
- but attaching this to DRCs doesn't help for those.

The semantics of the hcall made me think, if this is going to be

re-usable for future if implemented at DRC level. Other option

is to move the async-hcall-state/list into the NVDIMMState structure

in include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h and handle it with machine->nvdimms_state

at a global level.


Hope you are okay with using the pool based approach that Greg

suggested.


Please let me know.


Thanks,

Shivaprasad


Reply via email to