The logic for iterating over the Sub-CRQ responses is similiar to that
of the primary CRQ. Add the necessary handlers for processing those
responses.

Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyr...@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
index e082935f56cf..b61ae1df21e5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
@@ -3381,6 +3381,86 @@ static int ibmvfc_toggle_scrq_irq(struct 
ibmvfc_sub_queue *scrq, int enable)
        return rc;
 }
 
+static void ibmvfc_handle_scrq(struct ibmvfc_crq *crq, struct ibmvfc_host 
*vhost)
+{
+       struct ibmvfc_event *evt = (struct ibmvfc_event 
*)be64_to_cpu(crq->ioba);
+       unsigned long flags;
+
+       switch (crq->valid) {
+       case IBMVFC_CRQ_CMD_RSP:
+               break;
+       case IBMVFC_CRQ_XPORT_EVENT:
+               return;
+       default:
+               dev_err(vhost->dev, "Got and invalid message type 0x%02x\n", 
crq->valid);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       /* The only kind of payload CRQs we should get are responses to
+        * things we send. Make sure this response is to something we
+        * actually sent
+        */
+       if (unlikely(!ibmvfc_valid_event(&vhost->pool, evt))) {
+               dev_err(vhost->dev, "Returned correlation_token 0x%08llx is 
invalid!\n",
+                       crq->ioba);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       if (unlikely(atomic_read(&evt->free))) {
+               dev_err(vhost->dev, "Received duplicate correlation_token 
0x%08llx!\n",
+                       crq->ioba);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       del_timer(&evt->timer);
+       list_del(&evt->queue);
+       ibmvfc_trc_end(evt);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+       evt->done(evt);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static struct ibmvfc_crq *ibmvfc_next_scrq(struct ibmvfc_sub_queue *scrq)
+{
+       struct ibmvfc_crq *crq;
+
+       crq = &scrq->msgs[scrq->cur].crq;
+       if (crq->valid & 0x80) {
+               if (++scrq->cur == scrq->size)
+                       scrq->cur = 0;
+               rmb();
+       } else
+               crq = NULL;
+
+       return crq;
+}
+
+static void ibmvfc_drain_sub_crq(struct ibmvfc_sub_queue *scrq)
+{
+       struct ibmvfc_crq *crq;
+       unsigned long flags;
+       int done = 0;
+
+       spin_lock_irqsave(scrq->vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+       while (!done) {
+               while ((crq = ibmvfc_next_scrq(scrq)) != NULL) {
+                       ibmvfc_handle_scrq(crq, scrq->vhost);
+                       crq->valid = 0;
+                       wmb();
+               }
+
+               ibmvfc_toggle_scrq_irq(scrq, 1);
+               if ((crq = ibmvfc_next_scrq(scrq)) != NULL) {
+                       ibmvfc_toggle_scrq_irq(scrq, 0);
+                       ibmvfc_handle_scrq(crq, scrq->vhost);
+                       crq->valid = 0;
+                       wmb();
+               } else
+                       done = 1;
+       }
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(scrq->vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+}
+
 /**
  * ibmvfc_init_tgt - Set the next init job step for the target
  * @tgt:               ibmvfc target struct
-- 
2.27.0

Reply via email to