On 11/19, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> I think the following should work, and not require the first patch (compile
> tested only).
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace-view.c
> @@ -234,9 +234,21 @@ static int gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, const
> struct user_regset *regset,
>       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3) !=
>                    offsetof(struct pt_regs, msr) + sizeof(long));
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> +     membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,
> +                  offsetof(struct pt_regs, softe) - offsetof(struct pt_regs,
> orig_gpr3));
> +     membuf_store(&to, 1UL);
> +
> +     BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct pt_regs, trap) !=
> +                  offsetof(struct pt_regs, softe) + sizeof(long));
> +
> +     membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.regs->trap,
> +                  sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) - offsetof(struct pt_regs, 
> trap));
> +#else
>       membuf_write(&to, &target->thread.regs->orig_gpr3,
>                       sizeof(struct user_pt_regs) -
>                       offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_gpr3));
> +#endif
>       return membuf_zero(&to, ELF_NGREG * sizeof(unsigned long) -
>                                sizeof(struct user_pt_regs));
>  }

Probably yes.

This mirrors the previous patch I sent 
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190917143753.ga12...@redhat.com/)
and this is exactly what I tried to avoid, we can make a simpler fix now.

But let me repeat, I agree with any fix even if imp my version simplifies the 
code, just
commit this change and lets forget this problem.

Oleg.

Reply via email to