On 5/16/08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/16/08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This series is a set of changes to allow the slaves on an SPI bus to be > >> described in the OF device tree (useful in arch/powerpc) and adds a > driver > >> that uses it (the Freescale MPC5200 SoC's SPI device). > > > > Right now we have SPI hooked up to PSC3. Hardware engineer is gone but > > I'll see if I can get him to alter things to use the SPI controller. I > > have an old mail from him where he thinks the Phytec board is missing > > a signal needed to use the SPI controller. > > > While I'd appreciate the testing, I suspect that you really don't want > to do that. The dedicated SPI controller isn't very good. It only > does a byte at a time and so is rather slow. A PSC is SPI mode should > be better (but I haven't tried it personally it yet).
What is the device tree node for PSC3 supposed to look like when it has both serial and spi enabled? -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
