Hi Daniel,
On 10/12/20 7:14 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Hi,
To review this, I looked through the supported instructions to see if
there were any that I thought might have been missed.
I didn't find any other v3.1 ones, although I don't have a v3.1 ISA to
hand so I was basically looking for instructions I didn't recognise.
I did, however, find a number of instructions that are new in ISA 3.0
that aren't guarded:
- addpcis
- lxvl/stxvl
- lxvll/stxvll
- lxvwsx
- stxvx
- lxsipzx
- lxvh8x
- lxsihzx
- lxvb16x/stxvb16x
- stxsibx
- stxsihx
- lxvb16x
- lxsd/stxsd
- lxssp/stxssp
- lxv/stxv
Also, I don't know how bothered we are about P7, but if I'm reading the
ISA correctly, lqarx/stqcx. are not supported before ISA 2.07. Likewise
a number of the vector instructions like lxsiwzx and lxsiwax (and the
companion stores).
I realise it's not really the point of this particular patch, so I don't
think this should block acceptance. What I would like to know - and
maybe this is something where we need mpe to weigh in - is whether we
need consistent guards for 2.07 and 3.0. We have some 3.0 guards already
but clearly not everywhere.
Yes, those needs to be handled properly. Otherwise they can be harmful
when emulated on a non-supporting platform. Will work on it when I get
some time. Thanks for reporting it.
With all that said - the patch does what it says it does, and looks good
to me:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net>
Thanks!
Ravi
