Once we can't manipulate the address limit, we also can't test what
happens when the manipulation is abused.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c     | 4 ++++
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
index 4dfbfd51bdf774..0d5b93694a0183 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
@@ -315,11 +315,15 @@ void lkdtm_CORRUPT_LIST_DEL(void)
 /* Test if unbalanced set_fs(KERNEL_DS)/set_fs(USER_DS) check exists. */
 void lkdtm_CORRUPT_USER_DS(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SET_FS
        pr_info("setting bad task size limit\n");
        set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
 
        /* Make sure we do not keep running with a KERNEL_DS! */
        force_sig(SIGKILL);
+#else
+       pr_err("XFAIL: this requires set_fs()\n");
+#endif
 }
 
 /* Test that VMAP_STACK is actually allocating with a leading guard page */
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
index b833367a45d053..04d10063835241 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
 
 void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_DS(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SET_FS
        char __user *user_ptr =
                (char __user *)(0xFUL << (sizeof(unsigned long) * 8 - 4));
        mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
@@ -338,6 +339,9 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_DS(void)
        if (copy_to_user(user_ptr, buf, sizeof(buf)) == 0)
                pr_err("copy_to_user() to noncanonical address succeeded!?\n");
        set_fs(old_fs);
+#else
+       pr_err("XFAIL: this requires set_fs()\n");
+#endif
 }
 
 void __init lkdtm_usercopy_init(void)
-- 
2.28.0

Reply via email to