The signal handler in the alignment handler self test has the ability to jump over the instruction that triggered the signal. It does this by incrementing the PT_NIP in the user context by 4. If it were a prefixed instruction this will mean that the suffix is then executed which is incorrect. Instead check if the major opcode indicates a prefixed instruction (e.g. it is 1) and if so increment PT_NIP by 8.
If ISA v3.1 is not available treat it as a word instruction even if the major opcode is 1. Fixes: 620a6473df36 ("selftests/powerpc: Add prefixed loads/stores to alignment_handler test") Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniet...@gmail.com> --- .../selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c index 55ef15184057..c197ff828120 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c @@ -64,12 +64,14 @@ int bufsize; int debug; int testing; volatile int gotsig; +bool haveprefixes; char *cipath = "/dev/fb0"; long cioffset; void sighandler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx) { ucontext_t *ucp = ctx; + u32 inst; if (!testing) { signal(sig, SIG_DFL); @@ -77,7 +79,12 @@ void sighandler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx) } gotsig = sig; #ifdef __powerpc64__ - ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP] += 4; + if (haveprefixes) { + inst = *(u32 *)ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP]; + ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP] += ((inst >> 26 == 1) ? 8 : 4); + } else { + ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP] += 4; + } #else ucp->uc_mcontext.uc_regs->gregs[PT_NIP] += 4; #endif @@ -648,6 +655,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) exit(1); } + haveprefixes = have_hwcap2(PPC_FEATURE2_ARCH_3_1); + rc |= test_harness(test_alignment_handler_vsx_206, "test_alignment_handler_vsx_206"); rc |= test_harness(test_alignment_handler_vsx_207, -- 2.17.1