Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> If allocated earlier and the search fails, then cpumask need to be
> freed. However cpu_l1_cache_map can be allocated after we search thread
> group.

It's not freed anywhere AFAICS?

And even after this change there's still an error path that doesn't free
it, isn't there?

cheers

> Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
> Cc: LKML <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <an...@ozlabs.org>
> Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <ooh...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nath...@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org>
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schnei...@arm.com>
> Cc: Jordan Niethe <jniet...@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 698000c7f76f..dab96a1203ec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -797,10 +797,6 @@ static int init_cpu_l1_cache_map(int cpu)
>       if (err)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(cpu_l1_cache_map, cpu),
> -                             GFP_KERNEL,
> -                             cpu_to_node(cpu));
> -
>       cpu_group_start = get_cpu_thread_group_start(cpu, &tg);
>  
>       if (unlikely(cpu_group_start == -1)) {
> @@ -809,6 +805,9 @@ static int init_cpu_l1_cache_map(int cpu)
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> +     zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(cpu_l1_cache_map, cpu),
> +                             GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> +
>       for (i = first_thread; i < first_thread + threads_per_core; i++) {
>               int i_group_start = get_cpu_thread_group_start(i, &tg);
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1

Reply via email to