> We are not sure if this should be fixed in the driver or in uverbs itself. > Roland, what's your opinion about this?
Would be nice to be able to fix it in uverbs but I don't see how. In particular a kernel consumer has to have the same guarantee that no async events will come in after destroy QP returns. And I don't see any way generic code can provide a guarantee about what low-level driver code may do internally. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
