On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > If function callers and providers do not share the same prototypes the > > compiler complains of missing prototypes. Fix this by moving the > > already existing prototypes out to a mutually convenient location. > > > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > > > > drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:109:5: warning: no previous prototype for > > ‘check_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > 109 | int check_astate(void) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:114:6: warning: no previous prototype for > > ‘restore_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > 114 | void restore_astate(int cpu) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Cc: Olof Johansson <o...@lixom.net> > > Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > > Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pasemi.h | 15 ------------ > > Is there no sane way we can include this file directly to the cpufreq > file ?
Yep. arch/powerpc seems to be in the search path for modules on powerpc, so: diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c index c66f566a854cb..815645170c4de 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ #include <asm/time.h> #include <asm/smp.h> +#include <platforms/pasemi/pasemi.h> + #define SDCASR_REG 0x0100 #define SDCASR_REG_STRIDE 0x1000 #define SDCPWR_CFGA0_REG 0x0100 -Olof
