Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> writes: > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com> writes: > .....
>> @@ -232,8 +246,9 @@ void __init setup_kuap(bool disabled) >> cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features |= MMU_FTR_KUAP; >> } >> >> - /* Make sure userspace can't change the AMR */ >> - mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, 0); > > Why not just leave it there. It's extra insurance and it's good > documentation. We can't se the value to 0, because with hash kuap it is derived from what other keys are used for. Are you suggesting to keep it as if (radix_enabled()) mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, 0); That would confuse w.r.t what happens with hash. I can add a comment there explaining details? > >> + /* >> + * Set the default kernel AMR values on all cpus. >> + */ >> mtspr(SPRN_AMR, AMR_KUAP_BLOCKED); >> isync(); >> } >> @@ -278,11 +293,6 @@ static inline u64 read_uamor(void) >> return mfspr(SPRN_UAMOR); >> } >> >> -static inline void write_uamor(u64 value) >> -{ >> - mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, value); >> -} >> - >> static bool is_pkey_enabled(int pkey) >> { >> u64 uamor = read_uamor(); >> @@ -353,7 +363,6 @@ void thread_pkey_regs_save(struct thread_struct *thread) >> */ >> thread->amr = read_amr(); >> thread->iamr = read_iamr(); >> - thread->uamor = read_uamor(); >> } >> >> void thread_pkey_regs_restore(struct thread_struct *new_thread, >> @@ -366,8 +375,6 @@ void thread_pkey_regs_restore(struct thread_struct >> *new_thread, >> write_amr(new_thread->amr); >> if (old_thread->iamr != new_thread->iamr) >> write_iamr(new_thread->iamr); >> - if (old_thread->uamor != new_thread->uamor) >> - write_uamor(new_thread->uamor); >> } >> >> void thread_pkey_regs_init(struct thread_struct *thread) >> @@ -377,11 +384,9 @@ void thread_pkey_regs_init(struct thread_struct *thread) >> >> thread->amr = default_amr; >> thread->iamr = default_iamr; >> - thread->uamor = default_uamor; >> >> write_amr(default_amr); >> write_iamr(default_iamr); >> - write_uamor(default_uamor); >> } >> >> int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm) > > cheers -aneesh