* Tyrel Datwyler <tyr...@linux.ibm.com> [2020-07-06 13:58:42]: > On 7/5/20 11:40 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c > > index 9fcf2d195830..3d55cef1a2dc 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c > > @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void __init find_possible_nodes(void) > > return; > > > > if (of_property_read_u32_index(rtas, > > - "ibm,max-associativity-domains", > > + "ibm,current-associativity-domains", > > I'm not sure ibm,current-associativity-domains is guaranteed to exist on older > firmware. You may need check that it exists and fall back to > ibm,max-associativity-domains in the event it doesn't > > -Tyrel >
Oh, thanks Tyrel thats a good observation. Will fallback on max-associativity. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju
