On May 2, 2008, at 18:49, Olof Johansson wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 01:03:42PM -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
+static int __init board_fixups(void)
+{
+       char phy_id[BUS_ID_SIZE];
+       char *compstrs[2] = {"fsl,gianfar-mdio", "fsl,ucc-mdio"};
+       struct device_node *mdio;
+       struct resource res;
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(compstrs); i++) {
+               mdio = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, compstrs[i]);
+
+               of_address_to_resource(mdio, 0, &res);
+               snprintf(phy_id, BUS_ID_SIZE, "%x:%02x", res.start, 1);
+
+               phy_register_fixup_for_id(phy_id, mpc8568_fixup_125_clock);
+               phy_register_fixup_for_id(phy_id, mpc8568_mds_phy_fixups);
+
+               /* Register a workaround for errata */
+               snprintf(phy_id, BUS_ID_SIZE, "%x:%02x", res.start, 7);
+               phy_register_fixup_for_id(phy_id, mpc8568_mds_phy_fixups);
+
+               of_node_put(mdio);
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(board_fixups);

Are you sure you want to run this workaround on all boards that happen
to be built-in?  I.e. shouldn't you be checked for what board you are
running on, since the compatible strings you match on seem generic?


Shoot. That's a good point. I keep forgetting that just because it's in mpc85xx_mds.c, doesn't mean it's only being run on that platform. Alright, I'll resubmit.




-Olof

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to