On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 10:31:32AM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> Le 31/05/2020 à 04:27, Ram Pai a écrit :
> >From: Laurent Dufour <lduf...@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> >When a memory slot is hot plugged to a SVM, GFNs associated with that
> >memory slot automatically default to secure GFN. Hence migrate the
> >PFNs associated with these GFNs to device-PFNs.
> >
> >uv_migrate_mem_slot() is called to achieve that. It will not call
> >UV_PAGE_IN since this request is ignored by the Ultravisor.
> >NOTE: Ultravisor does not trust any page content provided by
> >the Hypervisor, ones the VM turns secure.
> >
> >Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@ozlabs.org>
> >Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> >Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
> >Cc: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.ibm.com>
> >Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com>
> >Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >Cc: Laurent Dufour <lduf...@linux.ibm.com>
> >Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauer...@linux.ibm.com>
> >Cc: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> >Cc: Claudio Carvalho <cclau...@linux.ibm.com>
> >Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org
> >Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> >Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linux...@us.ibm.com>
> > (fixed merge conflicts. Modified the commit message)
> >Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <lduf...@linux.ibm.com>
> >---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_uvmem.h | 4 ++++
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 11 +++++++----
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 3 +--
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_uvmem.h
> >b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_uvmem.h
> >index f0c5708..2ec2e5afb 100644
> >--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_uvmem.h
> >+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_uvmem.h
> >@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ unsigned long kvmppc_h_svm_page_out(struct kvm *kvm,
> > void kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages(const struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
> > struct kvm *kvm, bool skip_page_out,
> > bool purge_gfn);
> >+int uv_migrate_mem_slot(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot
> >*memslot);
> > #else
> > static inline int kvmppc_uvmem_init(void)
> > {
> >@@ -78,5 +79,8 @@ static inline int kvmppc_send_page_to_uv(struct kvm *kvm,
> >unsigned long gfn)
> > kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages(const struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
> > struct kvm *kvm, bool skip_page_out,
> > bool purge_gfn) { }
> >+
> >+static int uv_migrate_mem_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> >+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot);
>
> That line was not part of the patch I sent to you!
Your patch is rebased on top of my patches. This prototype declaration
is for the ifndef CONFIG_PPC_UV case.
>
>
> > #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_UV */
> > #endif /* __ASM_KVM_BOOK3S_UVMEM_H__ */
> >diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> >index 4c62bfe..604d062 100644
> >--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> >+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> >@@ -4516,13 +4516,16 @@ static void
> >kvmppc_core_commit_memory_region_hv(struct kvm *kvm,
> > case KVM_MR_CREATE:
> > if (kvmppc_uvmem_slot_init(kvm, new))
> > return;
> >- uv_register_mem_slot(kvm->arch.lpid,
> >- new->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> >- new->npages * PAGE_SIZE,
> >- 0, new->id);
> >+ if (uv_register_mem_slot(kvm->arch.lpid,
> >+ new->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> >+ new->npages * PAGE_SIZE,
> >+ 0, new->id))
> >+ return;
> >+ uv_migrate_mem_slot(kvm, new);
> > break;
> > case KVM_MR_DELETE:
> > uv_unregister_mem_slot(kvm->arch.lpid, old->id);
> >+ kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages(old, kvm, true, true);
>
> Again that line has been changed from the patch I sent to you. The
> last 'true' argument has nothing to do here.
yes. i did add another parameter to kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages() in my
patch series. So had to adapt your patch to operate on top my mine.
>
> Is that series really building?
yes. it built for me.
RP
