On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 22:19:08 UTC, Chris Packham wrote: > If {i,d}-cache-block-size is set and {i,d}-cache-line-size is not, use > the block-size value for both. Per the devicetree spec cache-line-size > is only needed if it differs from the block size. > > Originally the code would fallback from block size to line size. An > error message was printed if both properties were missing. > > Later the code was refactored to use clearer names and logic but it > inadvertently made line size a required property. This caused the > default values to be used and in turn leads to Power9 systems using the > wrong size. > > Fixes: bd067f83b084 ("powerpc/64: Fix naming of cache block vs. cache lin= > e") > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/94c0b013c98583614e1ad911e8795ca36da34a85 cheers