On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:41:52 +0200 Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c > > b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c > > index 024f7aad1952..046485bb0a52 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c > > @@ -139,52 +139,67 @@ void arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(struct > > optimized_kprobe *op) > > } > > } > > > > +#define PATCH_INSN(addr, instr) > > \ > > +do { > > \ > > + int rc = patch_instruction((unsigned int *)(addr), instr); \ > > + if (rc) { \ > > + pr_err("%s:%d Error patching instruction at 0x%pK (%pS): %d\n", > > \ > > + __func__, __LINE__, \ > > + (void *)(addr), (void *)(addr), rc); \ > > + return rc; \ > > + } \ > > +} while (0) > > + > > I hate this kind of macro which hides the "return". > > What about keeping the return action in the caller ? > > Otherwise, what about implementing something based on the use of goto, > on the same model as unsafe_put_user() for instance ?
#define PATCH_INSN(addr, instr) \ ({ int rc = patch_instruction((unsigned int *)(addr), instr); \ if (rc) \ pr_err("%s:%d Error patching instruction at 0x%pK (%pS): %d\n", \ __func__, __LINE__, \ (void *)(addr), (void *)(addr), rc); \ rc; \ }) Then you can just do: ret = PATCH_INSN(...); if (ret) return ret; in the code. -- Steve