Hi Laurent,

Laurent Dufour <lduf...@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> The newly introduced ibm,secure-memory nodes supersede the
> ibm,uv-firmware's property secure-memory-ranges.

Is either documented in a device tree binding document anywhere?

cheers

> Firmware will no more expose the secure-memory-ranges property so first
> read the new one and if not found rollback to the older one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <lduf...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> index 53b88cae3e73..ad950f8996e0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> @@ -735,6 +735,20 @@ static u64 kvmppc_get_secmem_size(void)
>       const __be32 *prop;
>       u64 size = 0;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * First try the new ibm,secure-memory nodes which supersede the
> +      * secure-memory-ranges property.
> +      * If we found somes, no need to read the deprecated one.
> +      */
> +     for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "ibm,secure-memory") {
> +             prop = of_get_property(np, "reg", &len);
> +             if (!prop)
> +                     continue;
> +             size += of_read_number(prop + 2, 2);
> +     }
> +     if (size)
> +             return size;
> +
>       np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ibm,uv-firmware");
>       if (!np)
>               goto out;
> -- 
> 2.26.1

Reply via email to