On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 6:56 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.le...@c-s.fr> wrote:
>
> This is the seventh version of a series to switch powerpc VDSO to
> generic C implementation.
>
> Main changes since v6 are:
> - Added -fasynchronous-unwind-tables in CFLAGS
> - Split patch 2 in two parts
> - Split patch 5 (which was patch 4) in two parts
>
> This series applies on today's powerpc/merge branch.
>
> See the last two patches for details on changes and performance.
>
> Christophe Leroy (7):
> powerpc/vdso64: Switch from __get_datapage() to get_datapage inline
> macro
> powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify
> __get_datapage()
> powerpc/vdso: Remove unused \tmp param in __get_datapage()
> powerpc/processor: Move cpu_relax() into asm/vdso/processor.h
> powerpc/vdso: Prepare for switching VDSO to generic C implementation.
> powerpc/vdso: Switch VDSO to generic C implementation.
This all looks fine, but I'm a bit puzzled why you don't add a
clock_gettime64() implementation in the same series. Isn't
that the main purpose of doing all that work?
Without it, any 32-bit user space has to go through the system call
for time()/getttimeofday()/clock_gettime() when built with a
modern libc.
Arnd
