Hi, From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> Date: 2020-04-16 18:36:38 To:"王文虎" <wenhu.w...@vivo.com> cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org,linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org,o...@buserror.net,linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,ker...@vivo.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3,0/4] drivers: uio: new driver uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram> > >Le 16/04/2020 à 11:29, 王文虎 a écrit : >> Hi, >> Seems there is something wrong with the server that multiple dumplications >> of the v3 patches were sent out, please ignore the rest and take this newest >> series as formal count. > >Which series ? > >It seems you sent 3 times, at 9:29, 9:41 and 9:49 (Paris Time) > > From the series of 9:29, I received patches 0 to 3 > From the series of 9:41, I received patches 0 to 3 > From the series of 9:49, I received patches 0 and 4. > >Looks like powerpc patchwork >(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=78320) >got: > From the series of 9:29, I received patches 0 to 4 > From the series of 9:41, I received patches 1 to 4 > From the series of 9:49, I received patches 1 to 4 > >So this seems to be something wrong somewhere. > >Christophe >
Hi Christophe, Sorry again, and I don't know which best fit you all. I guess a RESEND tag might help. So I will send another series with RESEND tag, please just drop all this three. Hope that relly won't trouble you yelling, and hope the mail server would work well. Thanks, Wenhu >> >> From: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.w...@vivo.com> >> Date: 2020-04-16 15:49:14 >> To: >> gre...@linuxfoundation.org,linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org,o...@buserror.net,christophe.le...@c-s.fr,linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >> Cc: ker...@vivo.com,Wang Wenhu <wenhu.w...@vivo.com> >> Subject: [PATCH v3,0/4] drivers: uio: new driver >> uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram>This series add a new uio driver for freescale 85xx >> platforms to >>> access the Cache-Sram form user level. This is extremely helpful >>> for the user-space applications that require high performance memory >>> accesses. >>> >>> It fixes the compile errors and warning of the hardware level drivers >>> and implements the uio driver in uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c. >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> * Addressed comments from Greg K-H >>> * Moved kfree(info->name) into uio_info_free_internal() >>> >>> Changes since v2: >>> * Drop the patch that modifies Kconfigs of arch/powerpc/platforms >>> and modified the sequence of patches: >>> 01:dropped, 02->03, 03->02, 04->01, 05->04 >>> * Addressed comments from Greg, Scott and Christophe >>> * Use "uiomem->internal_addr" as if condition for sram memory free, >>> and memset the uiomem entry >>> * Modified of_match_table make the driver apart from Cache-Sram HW info >>> which belong to the HW level driver fsl_85xx_cache_sram to match >>> * Use roundup_pow_of_two for align calc(really learned a lot from >>> Christophe) >>> * Remove useless clear block of uiomem entries. >>> * Use UIO_INFO_VER micro for info->version, and define it as >>> "devicetree,pseudo", meaning this is pseudo device and probed from >>> device tree configuration >>> * Select FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM rather than depends on it >>> >>> Wang Wenhu (4): >>> powerpc: sysdev: fix compile error for fsl_85xx_l2ctlr >>> powerpc: sysdev: fix compile error for fsl_85xx_cache_sram >>> powerpc: sysdev: fix compile warning for fsl_85xx_cache_sram >>> drivers: uio: new driver for fsl_85xx_cache_sram >>> >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c | 3 +- >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c | 1 + >>> drivers/uio/Kconfig | 9 ++ >>> drivers/uio/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/uio/uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 5 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/uio/uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c >>> >>> -- >>> 2.17.1 >>> >> >>
