A 1024 byte variable on the stack will warn on any 32-bit architecture during compile-testing, and is generally a bad idea anyway:
fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c: In function 'dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq': fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c:495:1: error: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] There are currently no callers of this function, so I cannot tell whether dynamic memory allocation is allowed once callers are added. Change it to kcalloc for now, if anyone gets a warning about calling this in atomic context after they start using it, they can fix it later. Fixes: 9d98809711ae ("soc: fsl: dpio: Adding QMAN multiple enqueue interface") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> --- drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c index cd4f6410e8c2..ff0ef8cbdbff 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c @@ -478,12 +478,17 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d, const struct dpaa2_fd *fd, int nb) { - int i; - struct qbman_eq_desc ed[32]; + struct qbman_eq_desc *ed = kcalloc(sizeof(struct qbman_eq_desc), 32, GFP_KERNEL); + int i, ret; + + if (!ed) + return -ENOMEM; d = service_select(d); - if (!d) - return -ENODEV; + if (!d) { + ret = -ENODEV; + goto out; + } for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) { qbman_eq_desc_clear(&ed[i]); @@ -491,7 +496,10 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d, qbman_eq_desc_set_fq(&ed[i], fqid[i]); } - return qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb); + ret = qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb); +out: + kfree(ed); + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq); -- 2.26.0